[r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: William D Clinger <will>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:21:06 -0400

In the 5.94 draft, the specification of binary-port?
is exactly the same as the specification of textual-port?.

Will
Received on Wed Jun 13 2007 - 13:21:06 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jed Davis: "[r6rs-discuss] and/or error"
Previous message: R. Kent Dybvig: "[r6rs-discuss] r5.94rs posted"
Next in thread: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?"
Reply: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC