On 6/22/07, Thomas Lord <lord at emf.net> wrote:
> You're just wrong on that
> point.
I don't want to bore the readers, and this discussion doesn't have
much to do with the original question of whether NaN is a number.
Therefore, I've posted on my blog
http://funcall.blogspot.com/ a
message showing how floating-point arithmetic runs into problems if
you attempt to model it with interval arithmetic. I'd be happy to
continue our discussion in blogspace, on usenet, or on a different
email thread.
--
~jrm
Received on Mon Jun 25 2007 - 00:13:15 UTC