Jed Davis <r6rs at jdev.users.panix.com> writes:
> If someone's already reported this and I somehow missed it, please
> forgive the noise.
>
> In section 6.3 of the libraries report, under "Any definition that takes
> advantage of implicit naming", this example protocol (used thrice):
>
> (lambda (c) (c (make-widget n)))
>
> seems incorrect; it should, I presume, be:
>
> (lambda (c) (lambda (n) (c (make-widget n))))
Indeed. Thanks!
(I might end up rewriting these examples entirely.)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 03:53:51 UTC