Jed Davis scripsit:
> These objections would not apply to equivalencing any two enumeration
> types representing the same *sequence* of symbols (which would be
> sufficient to make make-enumeration referentially transparent, I think,
> for whatever that's worth).
It still makes the bit-vector implementation unnecessarily annoying,
though; either you need to implement hash consing, or you end up
applying "equal?" rather than "eqv?" on the underlying lists of symbols.
--
Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child John Cowan
could understand this report. Run out cowan at ccil.org
and find me a four-year-old child. I http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
can't make head or tail out of it.
--Rufus T. Firefly on government reports
Received on Mon Jun 11 2007 - 09:17:53 UTC