I agree with Matthias on this.
On 2/24/07, William D Clinger <will_at_ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> The current draft already mandates hundreds of runtime
> exceptions whose whimsical purpose is to make programs
> that violate the requirements of the R6RS less likely
> to run to completion. Why should that kind of whimsy
> be limited to run time?
I'm less concerned about running to completion (as I have been
known to write programs that don't), as I am with running from
initiation. I'd like to get as far as *starting* my program even
if it won't finish.
--
~jrm
Received on Sun Feb 25 2007 - 00:16:24 UTC