[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: William D Clinger <will>
Date: Sun Feb 25 12:19:31 2007

Michael Sperber wrote:
> Why would it not enough for the compiler to just issue a warning,
> and to then abort at run time?

I have already answered that question. You are free
to ignore my answer.

Will
Received on Sun Feb 25 2007 - 12:19:22 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: R. Kent Dybvig: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations"
Previous message: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations"
Next in thread: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations"
Reply: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC