Michael Sperber scripsit:
> It does say "editors' committees," and that's as correct as I can make
> it. Having said that, I'll be happy to defer to a native speaker,
> given a right-hand side for the reduction rule.
Although the phrase "editors' committee" is grammatical, it is misleading,
suggesting a committee owned or controlled by the editors rather than
composed of them. I suggest "editorial committee" instead.
Note also that on p. 1 "committee" appears as "comittee", with only a
single "m".
(I am a native speaker.)
--
So that's the tune they play on John Cowan
their fascist banjos, is it? cowan_at_ccil.org
--Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Fri Oct 06 2006 - 10:42:03 UTC