Is it just me, or does the sentence (from 7.1 of R5.96):
When more than one library is identified by a library reference, the choice
of libraries is determined in some implementation-dependent manner.
seem useless? One might even think it implies the choice of libraries might
ever not be determined in some implementation-dependent manner.
Lynn
On 6/28/07, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
> William D Clinger scripsit:
>
> > There does not seem to be any sensible way for the Klepto version of
> > (r6rs enum) to be distinguished from the HerrScheme version.
>
> It's not clear to me whether Klepto and HerrScheme are separate
> implementations, or choices within a single implementation. If they are
> separate, then their R6RS libraries can be stored in separate directories
> on the filesystem, as is done with separate releases of Java, gcc, and
> so on. If they are choices, then they can still be stored in separate
> directories within the implementation's library directory.
>
> --
> It was impossible to inveigle John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
> Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> Into offering the slightest apology
> For his Phenomenology. --W. H. Auden, from "People"
(1953)
>
> _______________________________________________
> r6rs-discuss mailing list
> r6rs-discuss at lists.r6rs.org
> http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20070629/f63b1e6e/attachment-0001.htm
Received on Fri Jun 29 2007 - 06:13:20 UTC