On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:12:01PM +0300, Stanislav Ievlev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:07:55PM -0500, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> > ---
> > This message is a formal comment which was submitted to
> > formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at:
> > http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
> > ---
> > Name : Andre van Tonder
> > Email : andre at het.brown.edu
> > Type : simplification
> > Priority : minor
> > Component : enumerations
> > Version : 5.91
> > Pages : 118-120
> > Dependencies: None
> >
> > Summary:
> > --------
> >
> > No rationale is given for having the library (r6rs enum) in the report.
> > Unless there is a compelling rationale, it is suggested that the library be
> > dropped.
> agreed.
We already have symbols for enumeration values.
Received on Thu Nov 02 2006 - 06:13:43 UTC