[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme-6 should be differentiated from earlier versions

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Fri Mar 9 01:39:23 2007

Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:

> Because R6RS is a major, incompatible change from earlier Reports,
> occurrences of the word "Scheme" in R6RS should be changed to
> "Scheme-6" when the aspect being discussed is incompatible with R5RS.

RRRS was a far more incompatible change from RRS, but the name "Scheme"
was retained nevertheless. 

-- 
MEET US AT POINT ORANGE AT MIDNIGHT BRING YOUR DUCK OR PREPARE TO FACE WUGGUMS
John Cowan      cowan_at_ccil.org      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Fri Mar 09 2007 - 01:39:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC