[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Thomas Lord <lord>
Date: Wed Mar 7 21:06:54 2007

Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
> So SCM must settle for being a 99.44% pure interpreter.
>
>

So.... it floats.

-t

> _______________________________________________
> r6rs-discuss mailing list
> r6rs-discuss_at_lists.r6rs.org
> http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 21:15:41 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bear: "[r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?"
Previous message: Aubrey Jaffer: "[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?"
In reply to: Aubrey Jaffer: "[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?"
Next in thread: Lauri Alanko: "[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC