On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:38:47PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Trent Buck scripsit:
>
> > So the problem is that different scripts run "better" (e.g. faster)
> > in different scheme systems.
>
> Not only that, but if history means anything at all, different
> Schemes will support different non-standardized features.
> Unless "scheme-script" is meant only for *strictly* conforming
> R6RS programs that use no other features at all, it will matter
> very much which implementation is in use.
IIUC that is the approach taken by SRFI 22, and I would certainly want
scripts using scheme-script to be *strictly* conformant to r6rs (not
using any implementation-specific extensions).
--
Trent Buck, Student Errant
Received on Fri Nov 24 2006 - 00:21:23 UTC