[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: R. Kent Dybvig <dyb>
Date: Wed Feb 21 14:15:59 2007

> As dynamic binding can be implemented in
> terms of `dynamic-wind' anyway, I don't see how this is relevant.

It's only relevant in that your claim was bogus.

> What I'm interested in, however, it whether my implementation is
> faithful to your semantics. Is it?

Well, it's my code, so yes I guess it is.

Kent
Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 14:15:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: R. Kent Dybvig: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"
Previous message: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"
In reply to: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"
Next in thread: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC