[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] An exception might be raised

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Fri Sep 22 16:40:30 2006

Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan_at_ccil.org
Issue type: Defect
Priority: Minor
Component: Comments
Report version: 5.91
Summary: "An exception might be raised" considered confusing

I believe it would be more appropriate to use "An exception should not
be raised" in accordance with the definition of SHOULD NOT in RFC 2119.
This affects the definition in Section 5.5 (p. 20) as well as all uses.

If this is thought confusing, then "may (but should not) be raised"
is probably clearer, though more verbose.

It would be good to go through and make all MUSTard RFC 2119-compliant,
though one need not use the IETF all-caps convention.

-- 
Normally I can handle panic attacks on my own;   John Cowan <cowan_at_ccil.org>
but panic is, at the moment, a way of life.      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:43:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC