[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] proc in hash-table-update! should not mutate hash-table
I am posting this as an individual member of the Scheme
community. I am not speaking for the R6RS editors, and
this message should not be confused with the editors'
eventual formal response.
I wrote:
> My proposed specification would imply that every call to
> cons whose result appears in the result to map must be
> performed after all calls to proc have returned.
Untrue. The ordering relationship is more complex than
that. The fix I proposed seems about right, though.
WIll
Received on Sat Feb 24 2007 - 21:41:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC