[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Thomas Lord <lord>
Date: Tue Mar 20 12:52:39 2007

Thomas Lord wrote:
>
> As a matter of opinion, I think that the "maximally extended"
> implementation, of which real implementations could be
> regarded as various approximations, would have a lattice

er... "semi-"

-t
Received on Tue Mar 20 2007 - 13:02:10 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andre van Tonder: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole"
Previous message: Thomas Lord: "[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)"
In reply to: Thomas Lord: "[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC