On 30 Oct 2007, at 15:28, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> It is amusing to read these debates though I don't think
> it is productive in any way. Why don't we all spend time
> on producing R6RS or ERRR5RS compliant Scheme implementations
> and then use the feedback from these efforts to move forward?
My impression is that some people think that R6RS already got a
number of fundamental design decisions wrong, even though they could
have be gotten right already. I guess it's not motivating to fix
conceptual bugs that, in their view, shouldn't be there in the first
place.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc at p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:50:30 UTC