[r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Thomas Lord <lord>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:03:21 -0700

Joe Marshall wrote:
>
> I should have been more clear. By `research-worthy' I didn't
> mean `worth researching because of the benefit to the community
> in terms of code', but rather the more academic `worth researching
> because you can get papers published in journals'.

That is what I meant, as well.

-t
Received on Thu Jun 21 2007 - 16:03:21 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thomas Lord: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex."
Previous message: Shiro Kawai: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex."
In reply to: Joe Marshall: "[r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability"
Next in thread: Trent Buck: "[r6rs-discuss] GUI papers [was: compilation and portability]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC