[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Name:                  Mike Sperber
email:                 sperber at deinprogramm dot de
Type of issue:         Simplification
Priority:              Minor
R6RS component:        (r6rs when-unless)
Version of the report: 5.92
Summary:               (r6rs when-unless) should be removed
This is mainly an attempt to stimulate discussion: Given that `when'
and `unless' offer little advantage over just using `if', and given
that their definitions are so trivial, it's unclear whether the
benefit of having a separate library with these in the standard is
worth the cost.  As I don't use `when' and `unless', it's clear that
they're not worth the cost to me.  I wonder what others think.
-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla