On 11/14/06, Alan Watson <alan_at_alan-watson.org> wrote:
> The "real->single" and "real->double" procedures are restricted to real
> numbers. Why not rename them "->single" and "->double" and allow them to
> operate on complex numbers too?
If this change goes through, I would prefer "number->single" and
"number->double", which are more precise names for the comment's
intent.
--
Carl Eastlund
Received on Wed Nov 15 2006 - 12:53:25 UTC