[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename named `let'

From: Paul Schlie <schlie>
Date: Sat Jan 27 12:47:13 2007

If consistency is the goal, let etc. should be extended to support:

 (let ([<name>] (<param>) ...)) <body>); etc. i.e. let* letrec letrec*

where [<name>] if present is first newly bound within the scope of <body>;
and the previous named form denoted as being anticipated to be depreciated
at some point in time in the future.

Personally I see no value in introducing any newly named forms.
Received on Sat Jan 27 2007 - 12:46:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC