On 6/27/07, AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> > Is there
> > a section giving conditions that guarantee portability of code, rather
> than
> > intermittently declaring when it isn't?
>
> The note at the end of 7.2 has a very limited guarantee.
If you mean:
Thus, a library is portable only when it references identifiers in phases
consistent with the declared levels ....
then it needs to be rewritten. As it stands it provides no guarantee of
portability, only a warning of properties that are necessary for portability
but not necessarily sufficient. Maybe the following was intended?
Thus, a library is portable when it references only identifiers in phases
consistent with the declared levels ....
Lynn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20070629/40acd59f/attachment.htm
Received on Fri Jun 29 2007 - 09:53:05 UTC