[r6rs-discuss] The library name "rnrs" is overly precious

From: Trent Buck <trentbuck>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 07:01:37 +1000

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:41:11PM -0700, Ben Goetter wrote:
> From 5.96 11: "This chapter describes Scheme's /(rnrs base (6))/
> library [...]." Seems a bit twee to call the library /rnrs/. How about
> just plain /scheme/ for libraries described in the Standard?
>
> This also avoids the whole "sixth version of the nth report"
> interpretation of (rnrs 6).

+1
-- 
Trent Buck
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20070702/10bd6d54/attachment.pgp 
Received on Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC