[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: David T. Pierson <dtp>
Date: Thu Nov 16 21:29:30 2006

Another idea:

blob

This name actually has precedents, at least in database systems.

David
Received on Thu Nov 16 2006 - 21:30:14 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type."
Previous message: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing"
In reply to: David T. Pierson: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type."
Next in thread: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type."
Reply: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:00 UTC