Michael Sperber scripsit:
> While I agree with many things said in this thread, most posts I've
> read ignore the fact that the specification of
>
> #!/usr/bin/env scheme-script
>
> talks about a little bit more than just the first line of script: It
> encourages Scheme implementors on Unix systems to provide an entry
> point in the form of an executable called "scheme-script". It may be
> doing so in a fairly brain-damaged manner, but nevertheless.
So much the worse, I fear.
It's not uncommon to have more than one Scheme installed; who gets
to be "scheme-script"? By default, the last Scheme installed, which
is a silly policy.
I think it a great mistake to standardize the content of a hash-bang
line. It would be very useful to make sure that such a line is
not processed by Scheme systems, however.
--
What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped cowan_at_ccil.org
banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Wed Nov 22 2006 - 11:38:58 UTC