[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Inappropriate number of values should be defined

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Mon Jan 22 14:27:48 2007

Robby Findler scripsit:

> PS: it is really the evaluation contexts for begin that make this work
> (specifically the star on the evaluation context inside a begin). The
> text accompanying the semantics explains this in more detail. If it
> isn't clear, I'd welcome hints on what wasn't clear about it.

I confess that I have not read the formal syntax in sufficient detail
to realize this. I will file a formal comment to make sure the informal
prose of "begin" and "values" note this.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan_at_ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.

Received on Mon Jan 22 2007 - 14:27:37 UTC