[r6rs-discuss] macroexpand

From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum>
Date: Fri Sep 22 19:58:24 2006

On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Dan Muresan wrote:

> In my case, I would never give up macroexpand (especially since I have
> code that depends on it, and I like what the code does).

Given that many people here (including myself) don't see what
macroexpand
is useful for and that you find it extremely useful, would you please
enlighten us on what you found it extremely useful for?

Remember that we agreed that you cannot depend on the output that
macroexpand produces.

On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:53 PM, Dan Muresan wrote:

> It doesn't matter what the expanded form is *exactly*; as long as it
> can
> be fed back to the implementation being used, it would be useful. And
> that
> should take zero effort.


Aziz,,,
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 19:58:14 UTC