John Cowan <cowan_at_ccil.org> writes:
> Michael Sperber scripsit:
>
>> I agree that the report draft currently itself isn't as good as it
>> could be making that distinction clear and easy to understand. I'll
>> personally try my best to improve that situation. Concrete
>> suggestions on how to do this would be quite welcome.
>
> The obvious approach is to divide it entirely into two documents,
> "R6RS" and "R6RS Standard Libraries", as Sun did for Java.
> I think that would go a very long way toward reducing complaints.
I would personally very much like that, but haven't worked out all the
implications of doing that. There are a few forward references in the
document that prevent this currently, but all the ones I know of could
easily be fixed.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 17:12:34 UTC