[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"
At Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:41:29 -0400, Anton van Straaten wrote:
> Seriously, though, as I've already mentioned, I'm not arguing against
> finding a way to reduce the potential for the sort of confusion we've
> been discussing.
In the spirit of Will's earlier message hoping for a consensus, let me
add that I'd be in favor of renaming the "unspecified" value in a way
that made it more intuitive what was happening.
Robby
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 14:48:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC