[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: MichaelL_at_frogware.com <MichaelL>
Date: Thu Nov 16 00:22:26 2006

> A reference implementation will be made available within the next few
> days.

Wow... Fantastic.
Received on Thu Nov 16 2006 - 00:22:13 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Quasiquote should support unquotation within bytes objects."
Previous message: Carl Eastlund: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Multiple versions of one library should be linkable"
In reply to: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing"
Next in thread: Felix Klock: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:00 UTC