[R6RS] SRFIs for R6RS

[Manuel Serrano]

> I'm having trouble following your wording, but we voted on 5/26 to include
Sorry about that.

> syntax-case essentially as it currently exists, with the current pattern
> language intact.  We reaffirmed the decision on 5/27 when you brought up
> the pattern-language issue again.  So we're down to a few minor issues
> only, like adding a more general version of identifier-syntax.
I didn't remember that we vote, even if I remember that the general agreement
was to keep going with ad-hoc pattern-matching.

-- 
Manuel